August, 2010


31
Aug 10

@SSAT – Should teachers tweet? Social media and education

Last week @SSAT put out a call for opinions, contributions to ‘Should teachers tweet? Social media and education.’

With the help of Maureen Bowes (of People Intelligence) I had already started to organise my thoughts about Twitter in a post title ’5th Gear – Twitter for School Leaders.’ With Maureen’s input it documents the process of introducing a colleague to Twitter, taking into account not only the process but the emotions on the learner. (Its not yet finished but accessible via a SkyDrive). In a two week trial, Maureen engaged with Twitter – considering the implications for coaching ‘leaders’ through this journey. One might suggestion that Twitter is an article in its own right. Twitter media exposure often puts it in the limelight, but there is so much more.

I had already invested time in this training / sharing experience, in the process, documenting my Tweets, @pplintelligence replies and DMs and felt that the scope of the @SSAT title was in fact very broad. Twitter alone offers a mini series.

Twitter – converting the unsure

Twitter etiquette – follow, followers, @replies, DMs, # hasttags

Mobile Twitter – Smart phones vs desktop clients

Twitter – avoiding overload

Twither 5th Gear – twtapps and more.

 

I shared my thoughts Robyn Evans (Head of Marketing and Stakeholder Relations) and enjoyed a very open and positive conversation. @SSAT Twitter may have started the conversation, but the  phone call certainly added depth to the conversation. I applaud the @SSAT for publishing this  request, to crowd sourcing opinion (even if it may not reach the un-connected teachers this way) and  I am confident that this approach, the finished article,  will in itself answer the original question, ‘Should teachers tweet? Social media and education.’ Part b of this post, will of course be my response.

Popularity: 6% [?]


29
Aug 10

Lie(ing) to Me

I am a fan of the TV hit series ‘Lie to Me’ and this led me to the research of Dr Paul Ekman. I read his book, albeit little heavy going, and clearly see the relevance between deception detection and the demands placed on teachers. Deception detection is a skill developed by almost all teachers, in almost every school, with some teachers and school staff considered unofficial deception detection experts. Commonly, it would appear that pastoral staff possess refined deception detection and resolution skills as well as a high degree of Emotional Intelligence (I would assume). Yet, despite having to call upon our deception detection skills nearly every lesson and even in between lessons, every day, I don’t think that I have once seen a training event or CPD session assigned to help teachers and school staff refine these skills?

In fact, I don’t think that these skills were highlighted in the recent, very useful, crowd sourced #PGCE Survival Guide? (I will ask).

@tomhenzley were there any tips on how to deal with students not telling the truth??

@KristianStill. Eh? In the book? Not really I don’t think. Why?

Why… as I think many teachers, especially teachers in training would benefit from some guidance on deception detection.

How do teachers detect an untruth? What strategies do experienced teachers employ?

Here are a few ‘magpied’ strategies from colleagues that have influenced my career.

  • Give the students an early opportunity to correct themselves, to be honest. Don’t back the student into a corner, there is only one way they will come back at you.
  • You don’t always have to uncover a lie immediately. Some lies are best left unchallenged in the short term. Students may lie to avoid embarrassment or hid difficult personal circumstances. Some lies are best revisited at a later time.
  • A confrontation, deflected humour, rudeness – may in fact be a cloaked lie. Remember not all lies have to be resolved NOW.
  • Allow sufficient time between the student response and your next intervention. Time (often filled with silence) can be powerful.
  • Listen to the whole students. What / how they say it (language, pitch, fluency). What they don’t say. Watch the body language. Appreciate there are culture differences, for example the eye contact is not consistent across cultures.
  • Be willing to clarify your understanding and ask students to explain or re-phrase an answer. Asking students to ‘re-phrase’ a response will often identified rehearsed lies.
  • Ask the student to write down their viewpoint. This provides an uninterrupted response and a permanent record. This commitment raises the stakes.
  • Would this ‘untruth’ be better handled by another member of staff? Deferring a situation is a valid strategy.
  • Keep the door ajar, a room with a window, share a 1-2-1 appointment schedule with a colleague.
  • You don’t have to respond verbally. Write something down (fact or fiction), change your expression either way the students attention will be perked. Enough to come clean??

Online colleagues offered their perspective as well

@KristianStill difficult one. Gather evidence, ask appropriate questions, link evidence, talk on their own, with fiends in front of parents

A three part tweet outlined a key point.

@KristianStill Talk to EVERYONE and be sparing with what you know yourself. "I need you to be honest and I want to understand…" Give them time to think. Smile and empathise (but don’t undermine seriousness) And, of course, a big pile of written statements from others can help too #ukedchat

A very different strategy (depending on the situation) was offered,

#ukedchat @KristianStill dpds on situ. but i talk to others privately first pretend i know more then i do. want their side of things.

@KristianStill let them know if done something wrong, fine, we can work on that. they lie = loss of trust = less opportunities #ukedchat

@KristianStill clicking on their name on the register, bring up their behaviour record and see they have previous for the thing they deny

I would have to conclude that as I have developed my deception detection strategies, the more time I give my students to be honest. Reduce to punishment for telling the truth (be consistent) and raise the punitive measures for prolonged lies.

Our aim is not merely to discover the truth but to understand why they lied,’ Dr Cal Lightman.

Thanks @ajking1, @janekilpatrick, @onmejack and @paulhaigh for your contributions.

Popularity: 4% [?]


29
Aug 10

links for 2010-08-29

Popularity: 2% [?]


28
Aug 10

links for 2010-08-28

Popularity: 2% [?]


28
Aug 10

Samsung Galaxy Tab

Back in July, just as the IPad sales were impressing the stockmarket, I speculated that tablet devices might find their way into education by 2015 replacing netbooks as the preferred learning device. Cost and durability the most obvious stalling concerns. I might still be close to the date-pin, but the pace in this en-vogue market is insatiable. This is why.

Consumers / educators have less than a week to wait  until the official unveiling of the Samsung Galaxy Tab.

The first serious competitor to the Ipad.

There are plenty of online reports, noting an Android 2.2 OS, 1GHz processor, full Web-browsing, 3.1 megapixel camera, a QVGA forward-facing camera, HD screen for video, Flash support, support for e-books, possible GPS navigation and the usual Wi-Fi, GPS,Bluetooth  and PC linking.

The online commentary denotes a fierce competitor and the smaller screen (iPad is 9" but no camera) lowers production costs. How much lower will depend on how aggressive Samsung intend to be but one thing is for certain, the in education, in the ‘in the hands of students’ date has just been brought forward and the pace of change accelerated. As an advocate of 121 education, this is exciting.

New headline, 121 tablets learning devices in education by 2014.

Popularity: 5% [?]